2008年8月

这次聚会,每人带1瓶酒,活动地点在安泰中心的本咖啡。  
环境还不错,尤其是服务员小姐很是热情。不过好像大家也找了一段时间,呵呵。  
参加人员:书童,万年,潘凡金和王mm,妙吉祥×2,谢彬×2  
酒水单:  
1,CRAMA VERDE SAUVIGNON BLANC SEC 2006  一款罗马尼亚干白  

2,VINE MAYOV 阿根廷马约尔干白  

3,CAP SUR 2005 PREMIUM  法国南部的干红  

4,FOUR SEASONS ZINFANDEL   加州 四季的仙芬黛干红   

酒的评论大家有空上一下。  
这边记录一些总结吧  
1,学习需要个目标,进行专业的交流很重要,尤其是要有兴趣的学习。  
2,本次活动注重对酒的品评,对酒了文化,出处等关注的不够(虽然有所穿插)  
3,食物的搭配和配套设备还有所欠缺(冰桶太小,降温较慢)  
4,专业的人不够多,聚会的时间需要更长一些,可能下午的时间更合适。  
5,下次可以考虑去酒楼等地方,时间长一些,找个下午,分享一下文化和知识后顺便聚餐加品酒。  
大家都很热情,期待下次聚会。  


合影留念      

     
看酒标     

     
其中的两支酒     

     
把酒言欢     

     
观色     

     
酒瓶与嘴巴    

        
主角登场         

Features:Chateau Saint-Antoine dry red wine,form Bordeaux, is French AOC producing-wine, Use of new oak barrel aging. Composition with 65% morlet and 35% Cabernet Franc.the aroma is rich, soft tannins ,taste mellow and lasting after taste.

上面是背标上的介绍

试酒记录:

颜色:深宝石红,透明,有光泽。

香气:果香(李子,覆盆子),橡木香,木香。

口感:柔顺,有结构感,酒体平淡,后卫较短

kevin编译

    近日消息,受到坐果差以及冰雹影响,勃艮第产区2008年葡萄收成将比2007年低。

    虽然业内人士称现在下结论还言之过早,不过区域贸易组织BIVB宣称,潮湿阴冷的春天已经影响了葡萄的坐果。

    初夏的两场冰雹则是让勃艮第雪上加霜。第一场发生于7月26日早晨,摧毁了金丘(Cote d ’or)部分葡萄园60%的葡萄。而第二场则发生于8月7日更是席卷了整个勃艮第,BIVB称其中马孔地区更是遭到重创,不过受损程度还有待进一步确认。

    BIVB的气象监测负责人Christine Monamy表示夏布利是受影响最严重的地区。

    不过有人持不同的观点,认为冰雹造成的损害只是局部性的。位于哲维瑞-香贝丹(Gevrey-Chambertin)的杜雅克酒庄的庄主Jacques Seysses表示,他的庄园并没有受到冰雹的袭击。但marsannay ,位于金丘北部靠近第戎边界的地方确实已经受影响。

    与法国的许多产区一样,勃艮第的葡萄种植者,也有过与葡萄白粉病抗争的经历,并具有应对春、夏两季不稳定天气的经验。

    尽管目前天气恶劣,不过天气预报预测该地区下周天气就会转好,会是温暖的晴天。

    勃艮第产区的收成时间一般在9月15-24日,monamy对Decanter.com表示:“我不会对今年葡萄的潜在的收成质量做任何评论。”

    她表示:“现在只能做一个乐观主义者,一切还很难说。如果天气好,将为好收成提供了良好的基础。不过距离收成时间就一个月而已,让我们拭目以待吧。”

这个比较零散,主要是给这里的博友介绍一下当天的品酒的个人感觉,一下的内容完全是个人意见

当天10款酒中我个人选择的前三名
第一:Chadwick 2004
第二:Sassicaia 2004
第三:Chadwick 2005
说明:当天的各款酒都是非常高品质的葡萄酒,彼此之间的差异很少。如果不同的人对这些酒的好坏顺序有什么不同意见的话,完全是可以理解的,当天的评委也都比较专业,因此评比的排名个人认为似乎更依赖评委对于不同风格的偏向和经验。在盲品中竟选择了同一款酒的2个不同年份,也说明酒庄三个主要顶级酒款各自的风格还是比较准确和稳定的。

对于不同风格来说,如果在品质和水准相似的前提下,我个人会较多倾向与酒香气的优雅感,口感结构的完整性和平衡度,复杂性和质感,余味的长度,较少倾向于结构大小和力度。Chadwick 2004显示出来更好的成熟感,在我倾向的方面表现也是最好的。Dom Maximiano则属于充沛强劲型。Sassicaia的悠长余味在当天我品尝看来极为突出。Chadwick 2005有更收敛优雅和有深度的香气与口感,与Dom Maximiano两个年份相比后者更外向一些。

三款2004年份波尔多Lafite, Mouton和Margaux来说当天都比较封闭,Margaux的优雅特性在2004年表现不是很完美,结构感甚至略有缺陷,口腔中段的单宁甚至阻断了余味的延续。Lafite和Mouton两款的对比结果跟年初的2004对比品尝结果是一致的Mouton好于Lafite一些,Lafite的浓厚橡木感显得有点单一,余味也显得轻飘一些,不过表现比3月份在法国品尝的时候感觉好些。事实上盲品过程中我一度还把Mouton当作Lafite,当时的感觉是,这是一款Pauillac一等酒庄,没想到是Mouton而认为是Lafite的原因是,年初的品尝橡木感更重,而这次品尝复杂性,果味与橡木的平衡更完美。

Tignanello的感觉比较意外,与去年底品尝的感觉出入比较大,就是质感上的差异,而且单宁显得突出,当然结果也在情理之中Tignanello是Cabernet/Sangiovese

当天品尝的时候,由于品质十分接近,实际上我自己品尝了3轮,第一次闻香做大致分组,分了2组,分组分别品尝一次,两组中最好的2个,另外两组中比较接近的几个一一对比品尝一次,最后排到前6个的快速品尝一次。

kevin

    2008年7月8日,距离北京奥运会开幕刚好还有一个月,受智利著名的伊拉苏酒庄庄主爱德华多·查威克委托,由世界著名酒评家、《品醇客》(Decanter)杂志编辑史蒂芬·史普瑞尔(Steven Spurrier)主持,在北京香格里拉酒店举办了一场顶级盲品会。

    47位来自大中华区的酒评家,葡萄酒作家,侍酒师以及买家受邀出席了这场北京盲品会。值得一提的是为新世界葡萄酒翻开崭新一页的1976年巴黎盲品会正是由史蒂芬·史普瑞尔主持的。

盲品的酒单如下:

    三款法国一级名庄:拉菲(Chateau Lafite)2004,木桐(Chateau Mouton)2004,玛歌(Chateau Margaux)2004。

    两款意大利顶级酒:西施佳亚(Sassicaia)2004,天娜(Tignanello)2004。

    五款智利顶级酒:马克西米诺庄园主珍藏(Don Maximiano Founder’s Reserve)2004,2005,查威克(Chadwick)2004,2005,圣酿(Sena)2004。

    考虑到智利的产区位于南半球,每年葡萄收成时间比北半球早半年,所以智利的酒加了两款2005年份。

    11点钟,史蒂芬对北京盲品会评分细则做了介绍。每位评委们在经过认真品尝以后,评选出3款自己认为最佳的葡萄酒,分别给予3分,2分,1分。最后把所有评委的评分相加,得分最高者胜出。

    11:30,盲品开始了,只见每位评判面前都有十只一模一样的高脚杯,里面按顺序装着十款已经提前倒好的酒。可以说款款都是好酒,单看颜色,很难辨得出差别。只见评委们端起酒杯仔细的观察颜色,闻香,品尝,然后吐在一旁的吐酒壶中,并记下笔记,再用清水漱口,再品第二杯……。

    12:00,盲品结束。在现场统计结果时,史蒂芬先生逐一分享了他对十款酒的点评。从颜色上,香气,口感,余味等特征做了点评。每评完一款,专员就郑重端出那款盲品酒的真身,于是,马克西米诺,玛歌、拉菲、木桐西施佳雅等纷纷亮相,台下的评委们也纷纷发出惊叹声,或许是因为哪款酒自己猜着了而高兴,哪款酒错过了而遗憾。

    最后的结果会怎样,哪些酒更能迎合大多数中国的专家评委们的口味喜好呢?是波尔多,是智利,还是托斯卡纳?答案马上就揭晓了。

    最终,智利伊拉苏酒庄的马克西米诺庄园主珍藏受到最多评委的喜欢,其2005年份和2004年份分居第一和第二,意大利的西施佳雅排第三,查威克排名第四,而波尔多的木桐和拉菲则位列第五和第六。

    北京盲品会,再次证明了智利伊拉苏的高端酒的确已经具备了很好的品质,足以媲美波尔多和托斯卡纳的顶级佳酿,这是智利葡萄酒多么了不起的成就!

    北京盲品会,作为被称为智利葡萄酒产业发展里程碑的2004年柏林盲品会全球后续活动,也将中国人的口感喜好更好的传达给了酒商。

 On July 8, 2008, with still one month to go to the opening of the Olympic Games, the renowned owner of the Chilean Winery Vina Errazuriz asked me to participate in the “first-class blind wine tasting” at the Shangri-La Hotel in Beijing. This event was presided by the worldwide celebrated wine critic Steven Spurrier, editor of the “Decanter” magazine.
Among the forty-seven guests from the central part of China that attended Beijing’s blind wine tasting were wine critics, wine producers, sommeliers and buyers. Steven Spurrier also presided the wine tasting held in Paris in 1976, where a new page was turned in the world’s production of wine grapes.


The following is a list of the wines:
Three varieties of first-class French wines:
Chateau Lafite 2004
Chateau Mouton 2004
Chateau Margaux 2004
Two varieties of first-class Italian wines:
Sassicaia 2004
Tignanello 2004
Five varieties of first-class Chilean wines:
Don Maximiano Founder’s Reserve 2004
Don Maximiano Founder’s Reserve 2005
Viñedo Chadwick 2004
Viñedo Chadwick 2005
Seña 2004
 

Since Chile lies in the Southern Hemisphere, its yearly grape harvest begins half a year earlier than the harvest in the Northern Hemisphere. This explains why the Chilean wines include bottles from 2005.
 

At 11:00am, Mr. Spurrier explained the evaluation method for Beijing’s blind wine tasting. After tasting the wines, each member of the jury has to choose the three varieties of his or her choice and score them from one to three, with 3 points being the best wine, 1 point the worst wine and 2 points the wine in between. The total points assigned by each jury member are added up, and the wine with the highest score becomes the winner.
 

The blind wine tasting began at 11:30am. Standing in front of each member of the jury were 10 glasses of wine, all similar in appearance, and filled with different varieties of wine according to a previously assigned order. The differences among the wines could not be told by judging their color; all the wines were good quality.
 

The jury members raised their glasses to observe the color and sniff the wine; they tasted it and spit it out into a receptacle; then they took notes and rinsed their mouths with clear water before tasting the next wine.
 

The tasting ended at 12:00. As he was estimating the total points, Mr. Steven shared with the other participants his personal evaluation of the 10 types of wine using criteria such as colour, aroma, sensation and aftertaste.
 

After the individual scoring of the wines, the participants were invited to take a good look at the different bottles, which included: Don Maximiano Founder’s Reserve 2004 and 2005, Chateau Margaux 2004, Chateau Lafite 2004, Chateau Mouton 2004, Sassicaia 2004, etc.
Every single one of the members of the jury was amazed by the tasting. I think they were either very happy for having made a good choice, or upset for having made a mistake.
 

Which would be the final result? Which wines suited the majority of the experienced Chinese jury members? Was it the wines from Bordeaux, Chile or Tuscany? The results will be delivered soon.
 

At the end, it was Don Maximiano Founder’s Reserve, from the Chilean winery Viña Errázuriz which won the jury’s highest award, with the 2005 and 2004 vintages taking the first and second places respectively. Italy’s Sassicaia came in third, Vinedo Chadwick came in fourth, while Chateau Mouton and Chateau Lafite won the fifth and sixth places, respectively.
 

Beijing’s blind wine tasting was an opportunity to prove, once again, that the Chilean Errázuriz wines are undoubtedly good quality wines comparable to other first-class wines from Bordeaux and Tuscany. The Chilean wines have come a long way!
 

The Beijing blind wine tasting is considered to be an extension of the 2004 Berlin blind wine tasting, where the Chilean wine industry met the goal of progress. This wine tasting will allow wine companies to better understand the Chinese preferences regarding wine.